FieldNews
Subscribe

Daily oil & gas and construction news for subcontractors

Industry2 min read

Inspection Departments Still Struggling to Trust Their Own Data, Survey Finds

A survey of 131 owner/operators by Inspectioneering reveals persistent confidence gaps in inspection data modeling and decision-making technology, with bandwidth constraints adding to the challenge.

FieldNews Staff|
Editorial image: Aerial pumpjack field, golden hour - Inspection Departments Still Struggling to Trust Their Own Data, Survey Finds

Inspection Departments Still Struggling to Trust Their Own Data, Survey Finds

According to Inspectioneeringโ€™s State of Inspection Data Survey Report, published in the November/December 2025 issue of Inspectioneering Journal, a survey of 131 owner/operators worldwide found that inspection departments are still navigating significant gaps in technology confidence and internal capacity when it comes to data-driven decision-making.

Where the Confidence Gap Lives

The report, authored by Nick Schmoyer, Managing Partner and Technical Director at Inspectioneering, examined digital transformation in mechanical integrity across three areas: data collection, data management, and data modeling and decision-making. The data modeling and decision-making section stood out as a particularly revealing area.

Two themes emerge from the publicly available structure of the report: confidence in mechanical integrity tools tends to build over time rather than arrive with implementation, and bandwidth is a primary bottleneck preventing teams from getting full value out of the technologies they already have. In other words, operators may have the tools but not the people-hours to use them effectively. Thatโ€™s a meaningful finding for any company selling field inspection services into refineries, petrochemical plants, or midstream facilities.

What It Means for Subcontractors

  • Bandwidth gaps are opportunity gaps. If owner/operators lack internal capacity to fully execute their inspection programs, third-party inspection subcontractors with trained personnel and proven workflows are a direct solution to that problem.
  • Trust in tools takes time. Subcontractors who can demonstrate consistent, well-documented inspection data, delivered in formats that feed directly into a clientโ€™s existing MI systems, will have an edge over competitors who just show up and turn wrenches.
  • Decision-making support is a sellable service. As operators lean harder on data modeling for run/repair/replace decisions, inspection firms that offer reporting tied to risk-based inspection frameworks, such as API 580 or API 510, position themselves as partners rather than vendors.
  • Mechanical integrity work is growing in complexity. Subcontractors investing in personnel familiar with data management tools and digital MI platforms will be better positioned as owner/operators continue pushing digital transformation inside the fence.

Get The Field Report

The week in oil & gas and heavy construction โ€” market data, the big story, and where the work is. Every Sunday, in 60 seconds.

Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

๐Ÿ“˜

Want the full picture?

Why Your Bid Lost (And It Probably Wasn't Just Price): How Industrial Subcontractors Can Present, Defend, and Win on Value

Losing bids you thought were competitive? The problem usually isn't your number. Learn why subcontractors lose work, how to present bids that justify your rate, and when to stop chasing price-driven operators.

Read the guide โ†’
Follow FieldNews
A community project byAimsio